Mayday Mayhem
April 30, 2006 at 6:57 pm | In Uncategorized | Leave a CommentMay Day Mayhem Schedule – Monday 1st May 2006, GMT
All Day: ‘Bandits’ Hand Promotion:
Win a holdem hand with 2 diamonds 3 spades and receive a bonus payment of up to $50. The hand must be won on the river WITHOUT a showdown…in other words steal from the rich. Terms and conditions apply.
09:00 ‘Workers $2000 Freeroll’
Before you start work win some serious cash and then take the day off! All you need to join is 1 action point!
11:00 $1000 Anarchists Bounty Tournament
Knock 1 bounty out and receive $100; knock both bounties out and win a massive $1000.
Bounty tournament attached to the scheduled $3500 Guar’t’d rebuy.
Bounty Players: LTrotsky and KMarx
15:00 $1000 Morris Dancer’s Bounty
Knock 1 bounty out and receive $100; knock both bounties out and win a massive $1000.
Bounty tournament attached to the scheduled $5000 Guar’t’d rebuy.
Bounty Players: TheSquire and TheForeman
18:00 – 20:00 The May Day Quiz
10 May Day related Questions- $20 each.
Terms and conditions apply.
21:00 ‘Maypole MTT’
$1000 added to the winner. $2 (no fee) rebuy with a normal payout structure – the winner will receive an additional $1000.
22:30 Labour Day WSOP $1000 Freeroll
Top 3 players also win a seat in the WSOP GF Freezeout, May, 4000 action points to join.
23:40 $1000 Brother’s In Arms Bounty
Knock 1 bounty out and receive $100; knock both bounties out and win a massive $1000.
Bounty tournament attached to the scheduled $10,000 Guar’t’d rebuy.
Bounty Players: JStalin and MKnopfler
NB: Terms and conditions apply to all May Day promotions – see below for details.Terms and Conditions:Special Hand Promotion.
- Applies to holdem real money ring tables only
- 3 or more players must be dealt into hand.
- Hand must be won on the river as last player standing.
- Hole cards must be 2 diamonds and 3 spades.
- All claims will be checked for any sign of suspicious play
- Management decisions are final.
Quizzes:
1. The first correct answer (as determined by the quiz host) will be deemed the winner.
2. No player can win more than 1 prize in any one quiz.
3. If the quiz host deems it necessary players can and will be disqualified from the quiz with loss of any prize.
4. The quiz host decision is final.
Bounties:
1. All winning hands will be verified for any sign of suspicious play
2. Bounty players cannot rebuy or add on.
3. Management decisions are final
WSOP Freeroll:
1. Seats are not transferable or exchangeable for cash
2. The top three players will be registered for the May WSOP freezeout GF.
3. Management decisions are final
Loveable Rogues Poker congratulates Merrymonk for winning a 2006 WSOP prize package worth $12,500
April 30, 2006 at 5:57 pm | In Uncategorized | Leave a CommentLoveable Rogues Poker congratulates merrymonk for winning 1 of the 4 WSOP prize packages worth $12,500 during the month of April. Eight more WSOP prize packages will be up for grabs during the next two months. Four WSOP $12500 prize packages can be won through a freeroll. Finish in the top 18 in a Loveable Rogues Poker $5 or $10 MTT and win a free entry to the WSOP Wired Freeroll which guarantees two $12500 prize packages to the 2006 WSOP in addition to whatever cash prize won from finishing in the top 18. Win a $3.15 daily MTT feeder tournament and you are only one step away from the $12,500 prize package. Merrymonk qualified this way and he turned $3.15 into a $12,500 entry into the 2006 WSOP. Make your dreams come true. Join the fun, opportunities and action at Loveable Rogues Poker.
American Voters Strongly Oppose Online Gambling Ban
April 29, 2006 at 2:25 pm | In Uncategorized | Leave a CommentBy Andrew B
A recent poll by OnlineGamblingMythsAndFacts.com website (OGMF) has revealed what
Americans really think about online gambling and the federal government’s most recent
efforts to ban it. The poll of over 30,000 likely voters was conducted in March 2006
and overwhelmingly establishes that Americans do not want the federal government enacting
laws that restrict a recreational activity such as online gambling. Almost 80 percent
of Americans are opposed to the pending bills in Congress to ban online gambling. The poll
also reveals that 78 percent do not think it is appropriate for the federal government
to restrict what adults do on the Internet in the privacy of their own homes. Conducted by
Zogby International, the margin of error in the poll is +/- 0.6 percentage points. The
will of American voters is unmistakably clear on online gambling and Congress should
respect this freedom of choice about whether an adult American should be able to engage
in private recreational activities, such as gambling, in the comfort of their own homes.
Gavin Smith Is the WPT Player of the Year
April 26, 2006 at 8:39 pm | In Uncategorized | Leave a CommentThree Final Tables in Season Four Gave Him the Title
by Bob Pajich
First published in Cardplayer
Gavin Smith is the World Poker Tour’s player of the year.
The Canadian-born player made three final tables in season four of the WPT, including a win at the first event of the season (The Mirage Poker Showdown). His total winnings for WPT final tables for season four are $1,494,440. He accumulated 2,100 WPT points for his efforts.
Smith appeared on Card Player Magazine’s cover in December.
The fifth season of the WPT starts May 14, with another installment of the the Mirage Poker Showdown.
Today’s word is.. ‘Talk’
April 24, 2006 at 7:18 pm | In Psychology | Leave a Commentby Mike Caro
First published in Poker Player Newspaper
Whenever I'm seated at a poker table, one of my main missions is to make my opponents feel comfortable with me. I believe the more they enjoy my presence, the more money I'll make.
I'm sure that sounds alien to some players who try to win by antagonizing opponents. Let me tell you what I think is wrong with doing that. It's true that in the short term an irritated opponent might go on tilt and give you a few bad calls out of frustration. But the longrange result of antagonizing opponents is that they might stop selecting you as preferred person to enter pots against. If you try to humiliate or ridicule them for playing weak hands, they often find it unpleasant to play against you.
So, what happens then? Well, then they decide that they're going to target their fun and frivolous play toward those who will giggle and enjoy the adventure along with them. This means that if you ridicule weak opponents, you're likely to be left out often when they willing choose to redistribute their chips about the table.
Most weak opponents are playing for the enjoyment of poker. They play poorly, but if you're not friendly they'll decide you're no fun – and they'll be much more likely to play weakly against someone else. You see, these players have money to spend, but they also get to choose where to spend it.
Invitation
By being friendly, sometimes whimsically weird, and giggling, I invite weak opponents into my pots. So, I have the luxury of effectively playing in a weaker game than a serious but obnoxious player at the same table! You heard it right – we're in the same game, but my "table" is easier to beat. Go figure.
I like to playfully talk opponents in and out of pots, depending on what works best for me at the moment. I'm good at it. But I try not to make the game unpleasant – ever. If I'm not involved in a pot, usually I won't say anything about it. Let the opponents competing for that pot talk to each other.
That's my philosophy. And never be rude to weak opponents. There are other types of players who like to talk at the table, but frequently what they say isn't focused. It's almost random luck whether what they say helps or harms their bankroll. But even worse than random chatter is something I'm going to talk about today. This is a short, old lecture I gave about how some players talk themselves out of the money. Here it is…
Bad poker talk
Sure, I talk a lot about strategy and statistics. In fact, I've spent a good share of my life programming computers to play poker and to analyze data. This means the answers we share that are based on that research are better than anything else you'll get anywhere else. Period. End of story.
Fine. But there's more to poker than mathematics and impersonal strategy. I teach that once you've mastered the basics of winning poker, most of your profit will come from psychological aspects.
That's why I wrote the Book of Tells – the Body Language of Poker. And that's why I spend so much time teaching tells, manipulation, and image. Let me give you a clue about image right now.
Once you know something about poker that others don't know, you're proud and it's only natural to want to let them know how great you are. That's why so many otherwise skillful poker players sit at the table looking alert and superior and making sure everyone knows that they're concentrating. Hey, wait! You don't want to look like you're concentrating. Did you know, that one of the worst possible images you can convey to weak opponents is concentration?
Carefree behavior
Listen. You want weak opponents to feel comfortable giggling and playing badly. One thing that will make them self conscious and bring their party to a halt is if you make them think you're taking poker too seriously. The best image for extracting the most profit is to seem in sync with their carefree behavior. Giggle and have fun.
But most of all, don't do the one thing that kills games and eliminates profit. That one thing is analyzing hands at the table. Sadly, I've seen plenty of times where a smug, smart, alert would-be professional sits down in a game that is like a candy store with mostly weak, happy players and destroys the mood within minutes. All it takes is for him to start talking shop with another professional. "You shouldn't have raised, because there's a thirty percent chance, yak, yak, yak…"
Meanwhile, the very fact that they're discussing this costs them and every other serious player at the table hundreds of dollars or more. Why? Because by discussing strategy seriously, they're alerting carefree opponents that there really is serious strategy. This often makes those opponents self-conscious and changes their mood and their behavior.
They become more cautious and less playful. You get many fewer weak calls and you make much less money. In fact, serious players discussing technical strategy that might only be worth a few pennies of difference can be costing themselves hundreds of dollars. Not a good trade-off, is it?
So, my advice is, when you're against weak players, blend in and don't let them know that you're carefully scrutinizing their play. You should be analytical, of course, but you should keep it to yourself.
This is "The Mad Genius of Poker" Mike Caro and that's my secret today.
Mike Caro is widely regarded as the world's foremost authority on poker strategy, psychology, and statistics. A renowned player and founder of Mike Caro University of Poker, Gaming, and Life Strategy, he is known as "the Mad Genius of Poker," because of his lively delivery of concepts and latest research. You can visit him at www.poker1.com.
Going on tilt will destroy your bankroll.
April 24, 2006 at 3:40 pm | In Psychology | Leave a Commentby Barry Shulman
Tip # 50 of 52 from the book, 52 Tips for Texas Hold'em
First published in Card Player
This tip is here for encouragement, although the wording may not appear to be uplifting. Tilt is a poker player’s enemy when it happens to him, and friend when it happens to other players in the game. You can use tilt to your advantage by not falling victim to it, even though your opponents do.
What is tilt? Quite simply, tilt occurs when a run of bad luck causes a player to make irrational decisions in a poker game, letting emotion guide him instead of reason. Tilt can be instigated by the turn of a single unfortunate card, or as the culmination of a two-week streak of bad luck. Each player has a different “tilting point,” and it is important to recognize your own.
Unfortunately, it is often extremely difficult to admit to yourself when enough is enough. If you insist on staying in a game after you have reached your tilting point, you are likely to “tilt off” a significant number of chips to your undeserving opponents. Any player who is able to admit to himself when he is emotionally unfit to play further, perhaps due to some bad luck in the game, and is strong enough to stand up and leave, is way ahead of the competition.
A true understanding of the nature of poker is one of the best ways to avoid going on tilt. You should realize that this game has an incredible amount of short-term luck, allowing less skilled or even poor players to win improbably for extended periods of time. Don’t be discouraged by this, though; rather, realize that this is the lure for the weaker players. If the best players always won, there wouldn’t be any poker games. The losers would take up War or some other game in which they had a fighting chance.
Every poker player at one time or another endures a seemingly endless bad streak in which his A-A or K-K never seems to hold up, his A-K is consistently greeted with a flop of 7-8-9, and his J-J is pummeled by a flop of A-K-5. What you must realize when this is happening to you is that you are not alone. This is simply part of the inevitable statistical deviations in the game. It will happen to you just as surely as it happens to everyone else at one time or another. By the way, it is generally not recommended to share your pain with your neighbors in a poker game. Although they may pretend to lend a sympathetic ear, they aren’t really listening. They are simply waiting for a pause into which they might insert their own tales of woe.
You must remember that poker is a long-run proposition. It is of key importance that you play correctly in all situations, even on days when nothing is going right. If you give in and start “playing like them,” you will just lose more money. Regardless of how well you play, though, you will have some losing days. It should be your goal to walk away from these losing sessions saying to yourself, “I lost $100 today, but any other player would have lost $300.”
Striving for perfect play, rather than perfect results, should ultimately help you to avoid going on tilt. If you can come to terms with the fact that occasionally someone will hit a 40-to-1 draw on you, you will be better equipped to handle the swings of the game. Focus on what you can control, and you will maintain the emotional balance necessary to beat the game. And, if you feel that balance slipping away, quit the game for the day, week, or month — until you have regained your composure.
Playing Pocket Aces
April 22, 2006 at 3:27 pm | In Texas Holdem No Limit | Leave a Commentby by John Vorhaus
First published in Poker Player Newspaper
When you look down at your hole cards and see those pungent eyeballs looking back, your blood races, your heart pounds, and your hands begin to sweat. It's a natural reaction to pocket aces. After all, you've got the best possible hold'em hand. Everyone else is chasing you. In this instant, many players have an urge to drag (slowplay) aces. May I suggest that you fight this urge? Around here we have a saying:
SLOWPLAY ACES, GO TO HELL
Here's why, in three easy reasons.
1. When you slowplay aces, you let bad hands see cheap flops. Maybe the small blind completes with 7-8 suited and flops a 9-6-5 straight. You don't put him on a made hand, so you blithely bet out, only to face a raise. Now your bile rises — how dare he raise your aces? — so you reraise. Next thing you know, you're all in and drawing dead, just because you let some piece of cheap cheese into the pot.
2. Pocket aces don't like a lot of company. Yes, they're a preflop favorite against any other single hand. They're even a favorite against two or three other hands. As soon as they face four foes, though, your pocket aces become an underdog to the field. We raise with aces, then, not just to drive out crap hands but to preserve the edge our aces have.
3. Don't you want to earn some scratch? How will you do that if you don't get some money into the pot. Antonio Esfandiari's simple strategy for no limit hold'em is this: Build a pot, then take it away. That strategy works especially well when you hold a powerhouse like magic bullets. In the face of all this compelling logic, why do we drag our aces, ever? The answer is really not strategic, it's emotional. Aces come along so rarely that we don't want to waste them. We want to make big money from our big hands. We're afraid if we raise, everyone will fold, and we'll have nothing to show for our big aces but some piddling blinds. Know what? That's not the end of the world. At least you didn't let 8-7 suited in for cheap and take you off your whole stack.
Anyway, if everyone runs for cover when you raise with aces, you're probably not raising often enough with other hands. You do want to be raising, you know, with sufficient frequency so that your foes won't put you on a premium hand every time you push in some serious dosh. So here's a thought:
DON'T SLOWPLAY ACES — FASTPLAY OTHER HANDS
That way, when you raise with aces, your foes will figure it's just another one of your frisky attempts to be a big hairy bully. They won't put you on aces and they will pay you off. Good times.
So the next time you look down at your hole cards and see those pungent eyeballs staring back at you, stifle all feelings of entitlement and concentrate on the task at hand: protecting your big pocket pair and making sure you get some profit from the hand.
Poker’s Popularity Still Rising
April 18, 2006 at 11:17 pm | In Uncategorized | 3 Commentsby Ian McKenzie
First published in Bluff Magazine
| According to the PokerPages.com Industry Index, an industry standard when it comes to measuring the growth in live poker, the game hasn't missed a beat as far as its soaring popularity is concerned.The PokerPages Industry Index for the first quarter of 2006 resides at 130, indicating a growth of 30 percent versus the same period last year — with total buy-in dollars just over $98 million. The growth over the last 12 months remains very strong, with the Buy-in Index for the period at 155, indicating growth of 55 percent over the previous 12-month period.
This growth can be attributed to an expanding player base, according to PokerPages.com founder Mark Napolitano. "The Entrants Index continues to show a strong pattern of growth, showing tournament entries up 15 percent versus last year at 115," he added. "Industry growth is also being helped out by a rising average buy-in per entry. The Average Buy-in per Entry Index for the quarter is 113, showing a growth of 13 percent versus the same quarter last year, with an average buy-in of $1,207 per entry. This also represents a trend with four consecutive months over $1,000." |
Mistakes
April 18, 2006 at 11:17 pm | In Psychology | Leave a Commentby by John Carlisle
First published in Poker Player Newspaper
Tiger Woods hooked his approach shot into the water at the PGA event at Doral just a couple of weeks ago. Michael Jordan missed the potential game winner versus the Cleveland Cavaliers in 1985. Tiger still won the tournament. Jordan still won the game (by hitting his 2nd winning attempt of the game). The simple lesson: true champions can find a way to overcome mistakes to still achieve greatness. While these legends may have mastered the skill of playing through their faux pas in their chosen sports, this is not an easy exercise for most amateur poker players. Instead, an error can cause a swirl of negative emotion and self-doubt. Mistakes can lead to tilt even faster than a bad beat. In short, one mistake can often ignite the fast track to more costly mistakes.
Sports psychologists often spend large amounts of time mentally preparing athletes for let-downs. The mind must allow the body to perform optimally despite difficult circumstances. One example is that of a major college athlete who was faced with two foul shots as time was about to expire. With the team down by one, the free throws were of vital importance. The first attempt fell a bit short, hitting the front of the rim and bouncing out. The opposing coach, of course, called a time-out to "ice" the shooter before the game-tying attempt. The pressure was intense. The stakes were high. And the athlete had to rebound from the disappointment of missing the first shot. The seasoned athlete had practiced foul shots since he was a child. Although this one held more importance than any before, he just went about his normal foul shooting routine. Two dribbles, a deep breath, the bend of the knees, and …. swish.
I tried a risky bluff last night in pot-limit Omaha tournament at a popular online poker room. The betting style led me to believe that my opposition was weak. I figured him for trips, at best. With my draws missed, I talked myself into the bold bluff with a pot bet (more than enough to put him all in). My opponent called the rest of his chips in a heartbeat, exposing his full house. I had made a ridiculously foolish mistake. My instinct was to immediately play harder and faster to make up for my terrible error. I identified that instinct as a bout of tilt, so I worked to regain control of my emotions and thoughts. It started with a deep breath and some quick self-scolding. "What am I doing?" I said to myself. I shook my head is disgust as if trying to shake the cobwebs out of my skull. "Let's do it," I said aloud in the empty room. That understated mantra is my self-imposed command to get refocused and rededicated. I went on to a cash finish. If I would've allowed that single mistake to railroad my emotions, I would've been out of the tournament 35 minutes too early!
We commonly think that taking a bad beat is the most common pathway toward tilting. That is not correct, in my opinion. We most often steam after we play a hand poorly. The disappointment in ourselves is much more powerful than anger towards the unlucky cards or our opposition. Identify your mistakes, then work to get yourself back into a confident mental state before the completion of the next deal. Like the basketball player facing a tension-filled foul shot after his initial miss, coming back from a poker mistake involves preparation, routine, confidence, and preparedness. Never allow errors to compound upon themselves. Take control of yourself and your game.
Now go make it happen.
Determining How Much to Bet
April 11, 2006 at 1:13 pm | In Probabilities | Leave a Commentby Matt Hilger
First published in Card Player
There are always two key decisions you must make when taking the initiative in no-limit hold’em while playing a hand. Are you going to play, and if so, how much do you want to bet? The amount of your bet is always very important. If you bet too little with a good hand, you could be inviting your opponent to hit a long shot that might cost you your entire stack. If you bet too much, you might find yourself in a situation in which you are winning only small pots and losing large pots. A key part of the decision in determining how much to bet depends on the pot odds and implied pot odds.
This column looks at how to use odds and probabilities when deciding how much to bet. Realize that other factors such as psychological warfare are important in no-limit. Sometimes we might intentionally bet a big hand small, hoping that our opponents will sense a bluff and try to make a play at us. At other times, we might bet big, trying to indicate a bluff. Both are ways of using psychology during a hand. Putting the psychological part of the game aside, the first step is learning the mathematical foundation of how much you ought to bet. Once you master the foundation, you can then learn more advanced plays in terms of the psychology to use against each individual opponent.
Protecting Your Hand
The amount you bet on the flop is a critical decision in no-limit hold’em. Let’s start with an extreme example just to demonstrate a point. You are heads up in a major poker championship and are dealt J-J. The blinds are $10,000-$20,000 and you raise to $75,000 preflop. A very tricky, loose opponent calls. There is now $150,000 in the pot. The flop comes J-7-3 rainbow. You both have about $880,000 remaining in chips. How much should you bet?
Of course, there are always lots of factors that go into betting in no-limit, but we are going to look at one of the most critical factors, which is protecting your hand. You have flopped top set and the board is relatively harmless. Assume that you decide to slow-play and bet $40,000. Your opponent calls, and the turn card is an 8. Then, in a flurry, you are both all in. You turn over your set, only to look in exasperation as your opponent turns over 10-9 for a straight.
Your opponent was getting almost 5-to-1 pot odds to call on the flop; however, implied pot odds are critical in no-limit, as you can sometimes break your opponent, or vice versa. In this case, your opponent is getting good implied pot odds when he has to call a bet of only $40,000 in hope of hitting his miracle 8. He was 10.5-to-1 against hitting the straight. He must think he can win $420,000 to justify calling. There is already $190,000 in the pot, so he must be able to extract $230,000 more from your stack to justify calling. In this case, if you have a big overpair, there is a good chance that he can take your whole stack if he hits a huge hand. By betting too little, you put your opponent in a position in which it is correct to call. Protecting your hand is crucial to your survival in no-limit hold’em tournaments.
How should you protect a hand? Let’s go back to the example in which you have $880,000 in chips remaining. First, evaluate the flop to identify any dangers. Note that all of the following hands have gutshot possibilities: 10-9, 10-8, 9-8, 6-5, 6-4, and 5-4. This is actually a decent number of hands that you need to worry about. A gutshot is approximately 10.5-to-1 to improve; therefore, if you want to protect your chip stack, you must bet an amount to protect the amount in your stack and what is already in the pot. With $880,000 in chips and $150,000 in the pot, you can divide the total, $1,030,000 by 10.5, which equals roughly $98,000.
If you bet slightly more than this, something like $110,000, you ensure that your opponent is not getting the correct odds to call. If your opponent calls, he is making a mistake. There is no guarantee that you will win, but at least you are forcing your opponent into making a mistake because of the amount you bet. Of course, you could also go all in, which would really discourage a call, but you also want to encourage action in order to give yourself a better chance to win a big pot. This balance of risk and reward is a fine line that is important to evaluate when making decisions.
If your opponent hits a pair on the flop, such as a hand like 8-7 with the J-7-3 flop, he might call, thinking he has the correct implied pot odds to draw to two pair. If he hits two pair or trips, you will break him. When you protect your hand, you actually want your opponent to call, since he is making a mistake in doing so. Note that even if you bet slightly less than $98,000, an opponent should not call, as he cannot be sure that he can extract your entire stack. The $98,000 is simply the mathematical amount that truly protects your hand.
Try to bet amounts that will put your opponents into situations in which they will make mistakes by calling.
There are three steps to take when determining how much to bet to protect your hand:
1. Calculate the pot odds and the implied pot odds based on the smallest stack between you and your opponent.
2. Determine potential dangers with the flop versus your hand.
3. Bet enough that your opponent’s effective implied pot odds do not justify calling, given his odds of improving to the winning hand.
The second step deserves more discussion. A key part of it is understanding the texture of the board. My first book, Internet Texas Hold’em: Winning Strategies From an Internet Pro, looked at various types of flops in detail, and the potential dangers of each. Are flush draws possible? Could someone have an open-end straight draw? What about a gutshot-straight draw? Could our opponent have five outs to two pair or trips? Maybe it is likely that our opponent has only three outs in a scenario in which we both hold top pair (A-K vs. K-Q with a flop of K-8-2). All flops and all hands are not created equal!
Understand that protecting your hand is not always the only consideration. Sometimes you may be unsure that you have the best hand. For example, you might have an overpair and your opponent could have a set. In these cases, you have to balance how much you want to protect your hand with the possible risk that your opponent already has a better hand.
Also realize that protecting against implied pot odds does not always mean protecting your entire stack. You should bet an amount to protect against only the total amount of chips you are willing to commit to the pot. For example, sometimes your opponent might call a bet and hit a draw, and you would fold. In these cases, you are not giving your opponent implied pot odds, since you are not committing more money to the pot.
Odds and probabilities have many applications at the poker table. Psychology is still important, but be sure to use the odds as a foundation to help you make better decisions when determining how much to bet. ![]()
Matthew Hilger is the author of Internet Texas Hold’em. This column contains excerpts from his upcoming book, Texas Hold’em Odds and Probabilities: Limit, No-Limit, and Tournament Strategies. You can ask Matthew questions in his poker Forum at www.InternetTexasHoldem.com.
Blog at WordPress.com. | Theme: Pool by Borja Fernandez.
Entries and comments feeds.



