Beyond Skill

May 11, 2007 at 1:25 pm | In Psychology | Leave a Comment

by Jim McKenna

First published in Poker Player Newspaper

There’s a trait that goes beyond good poker skills. This is usually a trait that is reserved for players who like themselves, other players, and the game itself. It can turn lemons into lemonade. When you have been around this trait, you are glad you were there-even if you were beaten by another’s good will and sense of humor. It’s the trait of being happy and being up-in good times and in bad. Not many poker players have it. Those that have this trait seem to be the consistent winners.

 

Have you ever seen a negative player who is constantly complaining and whining ever do consistently well in poker? It’s a pretty rare sight. While they may get lucky occasionally, playing loose results in losing.

 

The same seems true of consistent winners. True, when you are doing well, it’s easy to be positive and upbeat. Yet, notice a consistent winner. When they have a bad run, they are not complaining. They are instead busy staying upbeat and positive. They are dealing with bad times and staying in a good frame of mind.

 

This is one of the reasons that I wrote Beyond Traps: The Anatomy of Poker Success. It’s coming out in June of 2007. What I say in that book is that, “Having the right attitude is probably the single most important power a person has to bring to the table. The best attitude to play with is a positive one. Attitude is like an odorless gas that can poison the room or infect others much like ‘laughing gas.’”

 

This is true in most of what we do. I learned a long time ago that when I did therapy and didn’t approach it as being my usual upbeat self, I would not do a good job. There’s something about my being myself, which is more on the upbeat than the serious side that brings out the best in my therapy and in my poker. There’s also something about being an upbeat poker player that can help your game. I was discussing this with a friend who plays a lot of high stake limit and no-limit games. He agreed that, “Having a positive mood is good for your cards!”

 

There’s also something beyond just being good at what you do and knowing all the odds of when to play and when to lie hands down. There’s having the self-control to deal with hard times and bringing an attitude to the table that other players are lacking. It’s the ability to bring an attitude of gratitude- that’s being grateful for being alive and still in the game. It’s the ability to look on the brighter side of things.

 

There’s the opposite attitude that will show up more often at low limit tables and in some very high staked games (where there’s already a lot of money in the pot from large blinds and antes). In these games, there are those with a “hold’em attitude” who play their positions with good combinations of high cards and connectors. Then there are the “no-fold’em hold’em” players who will play any two cards until the flop-regardless of position. It’s the difference between playing “hold’em” and what I call “flop’em.”

 

That said, let’s get back to how attitude helps or hurts your cards. Attitude will turn a seasoned and skillful player into a pompous child sulking because someone broke the “secret bargain” and stayed long enough to beat them. Attitude is not something players are born with. Besides being learned, attitudes can be changed. That’s the good news. By changing attitudes, players will enjoy others, the game, and even themselves more.

 

In short, players with bad attitudes are much easier to beat than players with good ones are.

WSOP Preview: The Process of Changing Payout and Tournament Structures

May 11, 2007 at 1:21 pm | In Uncategorized | Leave a Comment

by Tim Lavelli

First published in PokerNews

Directly in response to comments from WSOP 2006 participants, Harrah’s made some major adjustments in the tournament payout structure and the tournament blind and ante structure. The revised and ‘flattened’ payout structure is getting a lot of media coverage after a recent Harrah’s press release. Let’s look behind the changes to the reasons for the evolving WSOP structure.

Gone are the days when the Main Event winner will be splitting a $12 million dollar prize up among friends, family, backers and assorted litigators; while the bottom end 870-something finisher makes $4K on his or her $10K entry fee. Last year the $12M announcement was met by almost universal player response of: “Why so much?” and “Why not cap it at $10M and spread the wealth.” Well that is exactly what is going to happen this year.

Like so many good ideas, it takes action by a few individuals to start the wheels of change. After the 2006 Series, our sources tell us that Barry Greenstein sent a “revised” payout structure to the WSOP staff; this was basically Barry’s thoughtful response to the player reaction to the 2006 payout structure. His was the payout structure that became the template for this year’s Series. But change does not come with a single stroke of a pen and one payout structure does not work for the diversity of events that the 2007 WSOP offers. No, it took over 200 hours of work between WSOP Tournament Director Jack Effel and Players Advisory Council members (with significant input from Howard Lederer) to create the series of five unique Payout Tables. Think you know your poker? Check out the Shootout Pay Table on worldseriesofpoker.com, and explain the gaps in the entrant numbers.

The changes in most events will result in smaller payouts on the top end of the tournament, basically the top 27 will receive less and the resulting increase in payouts in the bottom 90-95% of the pay structure. Last year’s $12M first prize in the Main Event would come down to around $10M under the new structure and the bottom end players would take home $20K instead of $14K. All of the 2007 WSOP events will change in a similar fashion. The changes do not add more players to the payout structure but simply more money to those who do burst the bubble at the low end of the pay scale.

Right along with the payout structure changes were the changes to the blind and ante structure for all events. As previously announced, every event in the 2007 WSOP will start with double the chips from last year. Gone are the days where one big hand in round one of a 1500 chips event made you an automatic short stack. Again, a lot of hard work and collaboration between Jack Effel, Howard Lederer and the WSOP staff has created a new set of tournament structures that will allow for more play.

This is not to say that the starting chips were doubled and the structure left unchanged. To quote Assistant WSOP Tournament Director, Jimmy Sommerfeld’s classic line: “At some point in the tournament you have to bust some players out.” But change in the blind and ante structure allows for at the very least 70% more play for the prudent, patient player until their Aces get cracked back-to-back. Tournament Structure sheets can also be found on worlderiesofpoker.com

Blog at WordPress.com. | Theme: Pool by Borja Fernandez.
Entries and comments feeds.